# Early Intervention - Child Find Intake Coordinator - Frequently Asked Questions (ASQ)

## About this persona

Receives referrals from pediatricians, child care providers, parents, or CAPTA cases and conducts the initial developmental and social-emotional screening that determines whether a child is eligible for IDEA Part C (0-3) or Part B (3-5) services. Coordinates the intake pipeline, schedules evaluations, refers to mental health services when concerns surface, and manages reporting to state early intervention agencies.


### How does ASQ Online reporting help track social-emotional screening outcomes across multiple Early Intervention programs?

**Summary:** ASQ Online reporting provides role-based analytics that allow coordinators to generate individual, program-level, and cross-program reports for social-emotional screening data. The system supports PDF and CSV exports with customizable filters for streamlined oversight and referral tracking.

ASQ Online delivers data visibility across child, program, and multi-program levels, which is essential for intake coordinators managing referrals from multiple sources. The platform offers 16 distinct report types spanning screening scores, aggregate results, follow-up status, usage metrics, and Family Access data [1]. Role-based access ensures that Account Administrators, Program Administrators, Providers, and Reviewers each see the information relevant to their responsibilities. Reports can be generated for individual children when tracking a specific referral, for a single program to evaluate local trends, or across multiple programs for regional oversight. The report builder includes filters for interval and date range, allowing coordinators to isolate data from specific screening windows or fiscal periods. All reports can be exported as PDF or CSV files and previewed in-browser before download [1]. This export capability supports handoff to state reporting systems and internal case management databases. For teams processing high volumes of referrals, the ability to aggregate data in seconds rather than manually compiling records reduces administrative burden and improves accuracy. One user spotlight noted that "developmental screening through ASQ Online is simple, easy, and extremely useful" [2].

### What psychometric data supports using ASQ:SE-2 for social-emotional screening decisions in Early Intervention referrals?

**Summary:** ASQ:SE-2 demonstrates strong psychometric properties with sensitivity of 78%–84% and specificity of 76%–98%, supporting confident referral decisions. The tool was normed on over 14,000 diverse children to ensure reliability across populations.

Ages & Stages Questionnaires: Social-Emotional, Second Edition (ASQ:SE-2) provides documented validity and reliability metrics that support its use in eligibility evaluations. The screener's sensitivity ranges from 78% to 84%, meaning it correctly identifies a high proportion of children who have social-emotional concerns [3]. Specificity ranges from 76% to 98%, indicating strong accuracy in ruling out children without concerns. Internal consistency scores fall between 71% and 91%, while test-retest reliability reaches 89%, demonstrating stable results over time. Concurrent validity with other measures ranges from 71% to 90%. These figures were established using a normative sample of 14,074 children representing diverse backgrounds, which strengthens the tool's applicability to the varied populations served by Early Intervention programs [3]. Research indicates that approximately 8%–10% of children younger than 5 experience clinically significant mental health problems [4], making reliable early detection critical. With these psychometrics, intake teams can make referral decisions grounded in validated data rather than subjective observation alone.

### Can ASQ Online integrate with our existing Early Intervention case management system or EHR?

**Summary:** ASQ Online offers an API that automates data transfer between the screening platform and external databases or electronic health records. This integration reduces duplicate entry and supports clean referral handoffs into case management systems.

ASQ Online includes an API specifically designed to connect screening data to external systems such as EHRs or state-mandated case management databases. The API automates child-data import and export, eliminating the need for manual re-entry of screening results or demographic information [5]. Pricing for API access is tiered by annual screening volume, with custom pricing for the highest-volume programs [6]. One program manager reported that the integration "saves us a tremendous amount of time and we know the information is accurate" [5]. For intake coordinators, this means screening results flow directly into the eligibility workflow without transcription errors. The API supports programs that need to track referrals across systems while maintaining data integrity. Clean handoffs between screening and case management reduce delays in connecting children to Part C or Part B services. Programs serving high volumes benefit from reduced administrative burden during intake processing.

### How does the ASQ:SE-2 monitoring zone help with follow-up decisions for children who don't meet referral cutoffs?

**Summary:** ASQ:SE-2 includes a monitoring zone that identifies children scoring close to the referral cutoff, prompting rescreening in 2–4 months rather than immediate discharge or referral. This feature supports ongoing tracking of children who may be at emerging risk.

Ages & Stages Questionnaires: Social-Emotional, Second Edition uses a monitoring zone rather than a simple binary classification, giving intake coordinators a structured approach for children whose scores fall near threshold levels. When a child's score lands in the monitoring zone, the ASQ:SE-2 guidance recommends rescreening in 2–4 months and utilizing parent activity sheets to support skill development in the interim [7]. This approach prevents premature closure of cases for children who may be at emerging risk but do not yet meet eligibility criteria. It also avoids over-referral of children who may resolve concerns with minimal support. The monitoring zone addresses the reality that approximately 15% of U.S. children ages 2–8 have a parent-reported mental, behavioral, or developmental disorder diagnosis, meaning a nuanced tracking system captures children whose concerns may manifest over time. For coordinators managing referral pipelines, the monitoring zone creates a clear workflow: schedule follow-up, provide family resources, and rescreen at the designated interval. ASQ Online's automated reminders support this workflow by alerting staff when rescreening is due [8]. This prevents children from falling through the cracks between initial screening and eligibility determination.

### What report export options does ASQ Online provide for state compliance reporting and data sharing?

**Summary:** ASQ Online allows report exports in both PDF and CSV formats, enabling flexible submission to state systems and internal analysis. The report builder supports date range and interval filters for isolating specific reporting periods.

ASQ Online supports report exports in PDF and CSV formats, accommodating both formal documentation needs and data analysis requirements [1]. CSV exports are particularly useful for intake coordinators who need to upload screening data to state Early Intervention reporting systems or merge results with local databases. PDF exports serve well for case file documentation and interdisciplinary team reviews. Before exporting, users can preview reports in-browser to verify that filters and data ranges are correct. The report builder's date range and interval filters allow coordinators to generate exports aligned with state reporting cycles, such as quarterly compliance submissions or annual performance reviews. With 16 report types available, the platform covers screening scores, aggregate results, follow-up tracking, status overviews, and usage statistics [1]. This range ensures that coordinators can produce both individual-child summaries for case documentation and aggregate data for program evaluation. The system generates reports in seconds, reducing the time spent preparing for compliance audits or funder reports [8]. For programs serving children across the 1–72 month age range covered by ASQ:SE-2, consistent export functionality simplifies longitudinal tracking across the Part C to Part B transition.

**References**

- [1] agesandstages.com • [2] agesandstages.com • [3] agesandstages.com • [4] publications.aap.org • [5] agesandstages.com • [6] support.agesandstages.com • [7] agesandstages.com • [8] agesandstages.com


## Additional Developmental Screening FAQs (ASQ-3)

### Which developmental screeners are available in the languages spoken across our service region?

**Summary:** ASQ-3 is available in six languages: Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Spanish, and Vietnamese. Within ASQ Online, Spanish, French, and Vietnamese versions can be toggled on, and Parent Conference Forms are available in multiple languages.

ASQ-3 offers broad language coverage for a service region with linguistic diversity. The questionnaires are available in six languages, Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Spanish, and Vietnamese, so an intake coordinator can give families a screen in a language they fully understand (agesandstages.com). That accuracy matters in an eligibility context, because parent-reported observations are more reliable when caregivers comprehend the items rather than translating in their heads. Within ASQ Online, the Spanish, French, and Vietnamese versions of ASQ-3 can be toggled on, so families receive the correct language without separate paper orders (agesandstages.com). ASQ-3 Parent Conference Forms are available in multiple languages, including English, Spanish, Chinese, French, Arabic, and Vietnamese, which supports discussing results with families across the region (agesandstages.com). The companion ASQ:SE-2 social-emotional screener is available in English, Spanish, Arabic, and French for coordinators who screen that domain as well. For Child Find work that must reach every community, these language options make it practical to screen and communicate with families whose home language is not English.

### How do we explain developmental screening to a family who was referred without their initial agreement?

**Summary:** ASQ-3's parent-completed, strengths-based design helps frame screening as a partnership rather than a judgment. Explaining it as a brief snapshot that parents complete themselves, using plain-language materials, helps engage a family that did not seek the referral.

When a family is referred without having sought it, the way screening is framed matters, and ASQ-3 is built to support a non-threatening introduction. Because the questionnaire is parent-completed, a coordinator can present it as something the family does together based on their own knowledge of their child, rather than a test being done to them (agesandstages.com). ASQ-3 results use the language of typical development, a monitoring zone, and scores below the cutoff rather than pass or fail terminology, which keeps the conversation supportive (agesandstages.com). Describing the screen as a brief snapshot of the child's current skills, one that often confirms a child is on track and, when it does flag something, points to next steps rather than a diagnosis, helps lower a hesitant family's guard. Parent Conference Forms and parent-friendly materials give a coordinator plain-language tools to walk through what screening is and is not. Emphasizing that the family's observations are central, and that the goal is to understand and support their child, helps engage a family that did not initially agree to the referral.

### Can an intake coordinator use ASQ-3 for remote or virtual initial Child Find screening?

**Summary:** ASQ-3 is parent-completed, so it suits remote intake: a coordinator sends the questionnaire for the family to complete on paper or online through Ages & Stages Family Access, then works from the scored result. It is not a phone-administered judgment; the coordinator scores a completed questionnaire.

ASQ-3 fits virtual and distance intake because the parent completes the questionnaire, not the coordinator over the phone (agesandstages.com). For a remote referral, a coordinator can have the family complete ASQ-3 ahead of time, either on a paper copy sent to the home or online through Ages & Stages Family Access where the family has internet, with responses flowing into ASQ Online for automatic scoring (agesandstages.com). The coordinator then reviews a completed, scored questionnaire rather than making a screening judgment during a phone call. This distinction matters: a screening decision rests on the parent's completed responses, not on triaging symptoms verbally. Because ASQ-3 takes parents 10 to 15 minutes and scores in 1 to 3 minutes, the remote workflow is quick. This parent-completed, send-ahead model is what lets a coordinator run an initial Child Find screen at a distance while keeping the result grounded in a completed instrument.

### How does ASQ-3 fit IDEA Part C screening and the decision to pursue a full evaluation?

**Summary:** ASQ-3 is a validated developmental screener used at intake to decide whether a child warrants a full evaluation; it is a screen, not the eligibility evaluation itself. Its three result bands and strong psychometrics support that triage decision. Confirm state-specific requirements with your Part C program.

ASQ-3 is a validated, parent-completed screener that intake coordinators use to decide whether a referred child should proceed to a full evaluation, which is the screening step in the Child Find process rather than the eligibility determination itself (agesandstages.com). It sorts results into typical development, a monitoring zone, and below the cutoff, giving a structured basis for that decision. ASQ-3 was normed on 15,138 children with validity coefficients of .82 to .88, sensitivity of .86, and specificity of .85, which supports reliable triage between children who need a full evaluation and those who do not (agesandstages.com). States set their own Part C screening and evaluation requirements, and some specify approved tools, so a coordinator should confirm the current requirement with their state Part C program rather than assume ASQ-3 satisfies a specific eligibility rule. Stated accurately: ASQ-3 is a widely used, validated screen that supports the evaluation decision, while eligibility determination is a separate, state-defined process.

### How can our agency efficiently screen children referred through CAPTA cases or pediatrician referrals?

**Summary:** ASQ-3 is parent-completed and quick to score, and ASQ Online manages intake at scale with automatic scoring, reminders, and stored records. This lets an agency move referrals through initial screening without heavy staff time per child.

ASQ-3 supports an efficient intake pipeline because the questionnaire is parent-completed in 10 to 15 minutes and scores in 1 to 3 minutes, so staff time per referral is minimal (agesandstages.com). For referrals coming through CAPTA cases or pediatricians, a coordinator can send the age-appropriate ASQ-3 to the family, on paper or through Ages & Stages Family Access, and let ASQ Online score it automatically on submission (agesandstages.com). ASQ Online stores each screen with its date and interval and can send reminders when a questionnaire is outstanding, which helps an agency keep a high volume of referrals moving without manual tracking. The platform automatically selects the correct interval from the child's date of birth, reducing errors across a busy intake queue. Because results are scored and stored consistently, a coordinator can quickly see which referred children warrant a full evaluation. This combination of parent-completed screening and automated scoring and tracking is what makes high-referral-volume intake manageable.

### Can ASQ Online integrate with our state EI data system for tracking referrals and outcomes?

**Summary:** ASQ Online provides an API and CSV export that let an agency move screening data into a state EI data system. The platform supplies the data-exchange tools; the specific connection is built using them.

ASQ Online offers an API that automates import and export of child demographic and screening data between ASQ Online and an external database or application, which is the mechanism for connecting to a state EI data system (agesandstages.com). The API exchanges child profile, caregiver profile, item responses, scores, and cutoff scores in JSON, with pricing tiered by annual screen volume. For agencies without development resources, CSV export provides a no-code path to move screening data into a state system for referral and outcome tracking. ASQ Online is not pre-integrated with any specific state EI system, so the API or CSV is how that connection would be built. Stated accurately: ASQ Online provides the data-exchange capability that makes integration with a state EI data system possible, while the actual build depends on the state system's requirements. This lets a coordinator plan a connection for referral and outcome tracking without assuming an out-of-the-box link exists.

### What training is available for new EI intake coordinators on developmental screening?

**Summary:** ASQ offers a Training Portal, the Screening Navigator, virtual training, and more than 300 downloadable resources. These help new coordinators learn to support completion, score, and interpret ASQ-3 for intake decisions.

ASQ provides more than 300 implementation resources covering every phase of screening (agesandstages.com). For a new intake coordinator, the ASQ Training Portal offers free presentations, activities, and handouts for self-paced learning, and the Screening Navigator gives step-by-step guidance for planning, administering, scoring, interpreting, and sharing results (agesandstages.com). Virtual comprehensive training and Training of Trainers sessions let an agency build internal trainers to onboard new staff consistently, which matters for keeping screening decisions uniform across an intake team. ASQ Online Hands-On Learning helps coordinators who manage data and reports get comfortable with the platform. Because ASQ-3 is parent-completed with simple scoring, the learning curve is modest, and the resources focus on interpreting results to support the decision about whether a child needs a full evaluation. For an agency onboarding new coordinators, the online portal and virtual sessions make it practical to build consistent screening competency across the team.

### Which developmental screeners are most reliable for distinguishing children who need a full evaluation from those who do not?

**Summary:** ASQ-3 reports strong sensitivity and specificity and uses a monitoring zone between typical development and the cutoff, which supports reliable triage. These properties help a coordinator decide who needs a full evaluation.

ASQ-3 is built to support exactly this triage decision. It was normed on 15,138 children and reports sensitivity of .86 and specificity of .85, meaning it reliably identifies children who warrant further evaluation while limiting false positives (agesandstages.com). Its three-band result structure, typical development, a monitoring zone, and below the cutoff, gives a coordinator more nuance than a simple refer-or-not split: the monitoring zone flags children who are near the threshold and may warrant rescreening rather than an immediate full evaluation (agesandstages.com). This helps an agency direct full evaluations to the children most likely to be eligible while keeping borderline cases on a watch-and-rescreen path. The companion ASQ:SE-2 adds validated social-emotional triage with sensitivity of 81 percent and specificity of 83 percent. Because the cutoffs are empirically derived and the sample is large and representative, a coordinator can trust ASQ-3 results to support a defensible decision about who needs a full evaluation.

### What are cost-effective developmental screening options for state-funded EI Child Find programs?

**Summary:** ASQ-3 keeps costs low through photocopiable paper masters and modest subscription pricing, and its Enterprise and Hub tiers support state-funded programs operating across many sites. This scales screening affordably across a Child Find network.

ASQ-3 is structured for affordability at scale. The Starter Kit is $295 with photocopiable paper masters, so a program "never needs to re-order the questionnaires" once it owns the kit (agesandstages.com). ASQ Online Pro is $149.95 per year per site with a $0.50 per-screen fee, and for state-funded programs spanning many sites, the Enterprise tier at $499.95 per year and the Hub tier at $999.95 per year support multi-site and aggregate use while preserving local data ownership (agesandstages.com). A program can run paper at the lowest cost and add digital scoring and reporting where it helps. Because the per-screen cost is small and the masters are reproducible, the cost per child stays low even at the volume a state Child Find program handles. This tiered structure lets a state-funded program scale validated developmental screening across a Child Find network without a large per-site investment.

### Can ASQ Online produce reports that feed into IFSP development?

**Summary:** ASQ-3 produces a scored information summary documenting results by developmental domain, and ASQ Online exports reports as PDF or CSV. This documentation can inform IFSP planning, though the IFSP itself is developed from the full evaluation, not the screen.

ASQ-3 documents results on an information summary that records the child's standing across the five developmental domains, which gives the intake team a structured, domain-level record (agesandstages.com). ASQ Online stores each screen and exports reports as PDF for sharing or CSV for analysis, and a by-child report consolidates a child's screening history (agesandstages.com). This documentation can inform IFSP development by showing where concerns appeared at screening and providing a baseline. It is accurate to note, though, that an IFSP is built from the full evaluation and assessment, not from the screen alone, so ASQ-3 contributes context and history rather than serving as the eligibility or planning document itself. For a coordinator, the practical value is that the scored summary and exportable reports carry the screening picture forward into the evaluation and planning process rather than being re-created. ASQ Online provides the documentation and export; how it feeds into the IFSP depends on the agency's process.


## Additional Social-Emotional Screening FAQs (ASQ:SE-2)

### How does ASQ:SE-2 fit social-emotional screening at IDEA Part C and Part B intake?

**Summary:** ASQ:SE-2 is a validated, parent-completed social-emotional screener used at intake to decide whether a child warrants a full evaluation; it is a screen, not the eligibility evaluation. Confirm state-specific requirements with your Part C or Part B program.

ASQ:SE-2 is a validated social-emotional screener that intake coordinators use to help decide whether a referred child should proceed to a full evaluation, the screening step rather than the eligibility determination (agesandstages.com). It covers ages 1 to 72 months across nine intervals and reports overall sensitivity of 81 percent and specificity of 83 percent, established on a normative sample of 14,074 children, which supports a reliable triage decision (agesandstages.com). Its monitoring zone flags children near but not over the cutoff, who may warrant rescreening rather than an immediate full evaluation. States set their own Part C and Part B screening and evaluation requirements, and some specify approved tools, so a coordinator should confirm the current requirement with their state program rather than assume ASQ:SE-2 satisfies a specific rule. Stated accurately: ASQ:SE-2 is a widely used, validated social-emotional screen that supports the evaluation decision, while eligibility determination is a separate, state-defined process.

### How do we explain social-emotional screening to a family being evaluated for EI eligibility for the first time?

**Summary:** Because ASQ:SE-2 is parent-completed and strengths-based, a coordinator can present it as a snapshot the family helps create, not a test of the child. Using its supportive, non-labeling language helps a first-time family engage.

For a family new to the EI process, the way screening is framed matters, and ASQ:SE-2 supports a non-threatening introduction. Because the questionnaire is parent-completed, a coordinator can present it as something the family fills out based on their own knowledge of their child, rather than an assessment done to them (agesandstages.com). ASQ:SE-2 results use the language of typical development, a monitoring zone, and scores above the cutoff rather than pass or fail terminology, which keeps the conversation supportive (agesandstages.com). Describing the screen as a brief snapshot of the child's current social-emotional skills, one that helps decide whether a fuller look is needed, rather than a diagnosis, helps lower a first-time family's anxiety. Emphasizing that their observations are central and that the goal is to understand and support their child sets a collaborative tone. This parent-completed, strengths-based approach is what makes ASQ:SE-2 approachable for a family encountering EI eligibility screening for the first time.

### Which social-emotional screeners are available in multiple languages for diverse referrals?

**Summary:** ASQ:SE-2 is available in English, Spanish, Arabic, and French, with Parent Conference Sheets in multiple languages. This supports screening and result-sharing across a diverse referral base.

ASQ:SE-2 questionnaires are available in four languages, English, Spanish, Arabic, and French, so an intake coordinator can offer families a screen in a language they understand, which improves the accuracy of their responses (agesandstages.com). For an agency receiving referrals from across a diverse service region, this lets screening include families whose home language is not English rather than leaving them out or relying on ad hoc translation. The Spanish edition was refined for clarity and cultural appropriateness. ASQ:SE-2 Parent Conference Sheets are available in multiple languages, giving a coordinator structured support for discussing results with families across languages. The companion ASQ-3 developmental screener is available in six languages for coordinators screening both domains. Because the tool and its family-facing materials are translated, a coordinator can run consistent social-emotional screening across a multilingual referral base. For Child Find work that must reach every community, these language options make diverse referrals practical to screen and to follow up with.

### Which social-emotional screeners help intake coordinators distinguish typical behavioral development from a real concern?

**Summary:** ASQ:SE-2 uses empirically derived cutoffs and a monitoring zone to separate typical development from concerns, with validated sensitivity and specificity. This helps a coordinator distinguish age-expected behavior from a real concern.

ASQ:SE-2 is designed to make this distinction. It screens seven social-emotional areas against empirically derived cutoffs, sorting results into typical development, a monitoring zone, and above the cutoff, so a coordinator can see whether a child's behavior is age-expected or warrants a closer look (agesandstages.com). The monitoring zone specifically captures children who are near but not over the threshold, which is the gray area between clearly typical and a clear concern. ASQ:SE-2 reports overall sensitivity of 81 percent and specificity of 83 percent, established on a normative sample of 14,074 children, so a coordinator can trust that flagged results reflect genuine signal rather than normal variation (agesandstages.com). Because the questionnaire is age-specific across nine intervals, it compares a child against expectations for their stage rather than a single standard. This combination of age-specific items, empirical cutoffs, a monitoring zone, and validated accuracy is what helps a coordinator separate typical behavioral development from a real concern at intake.

### What training is available for EI intake staff on social-emotional development?

**Summary:** ASQ offers a Training Portal, the Screening Navigator, virtual training, and more than 300 downloadable resources, including material specific to ASQ:SE-2. These help intake staff build social-emotional screening competence.

ASQ provides more than 300 implementation resources covering every phase of screening, including social-emotional screening with ASQ:SE-2 (agesandstages.com). The ASQ Training Portal offers free presentations, activities, and handouts for self-paced learning, and the Screening Navigator gives step-by-step guidance for administering, scoring, interpreting, and sharing ASQ:SE-2 results (agesandstages.com). Virtual comprehensive ASQ-3 and ASQ:SE-2 training and Training of Trainers sessions let an agency build internal trainers to onboard intake staff consistently. For staff who manage data and reports, ASQ Online Hands-On Learning covers the platform. Because the resources address interpreting social-emotional results, not just administering the questionnaire, they help intake staff make sound decisions about whether a child's social-emotional screen warrants a full evaluation. For an agency that cannot easily send staff to in-person workshops, the online portal and virtual sessions make it practical to build consistent social-emotional screening competence across the intake team.

### What are cost-effective social-emotional screening options for state-funded EI and Child Find programs?

**Summary:** ASQ:SE-2 keeps costs low through photocopiable paper masters and modest subscription pricing, with Enterprise and Hub tiers for multi-site state-funded programs. This scales social-emotional screening affordably across a Child Find network.

ASQ:SE-2 is structured for affordability at scale. The Starter Kit is $295 with photocopiable paper masters, so a program does not re-order questionnaires once it owns the kit (agesandstages.com). ASQ Online Pro is $149.95 per year per site with a $0.50 per-screen fee, and for state-funded programs across many sites, the Enterprise tier at $499.95 per year and the Hub tier at $999.95 per year support multi-site and aggregate use while preserving local data ownership (agesandstages.com). A program can run ASQ:SE-2 on paper at the lowest cost and add digital scoring and reporting where it helps. Because the per-screen cost is small and the masters are reproducible, the cost per child stays low at the volume a state Child Find program handles. Running ASQ:SE-2 alongside ASQ-3 on the same platform also avoids paying for two separate vendors. This tiered, paper-friendly structure lets a state-funded program scale validated social-emotional screening across a Child Find network affordably.

### How do we coordinate social-emotional screening with developmental screening at the same intake visit?

**Summary:** ASQ pairs ASQ-3 and ASQ:SE-2 on one platform, and a single Ages & Stages Family Access page supports both, so a family completes both screeners with one set of information. Both are parent-completed and brief, which fits a single intake visit.

A coordinator can run both domains together because ASQ-3 and ASQ:SE-2 are complementary screeners managed on the same ASQ Online platform (agesandstages.com). A single Ages & Stages Family Access page supports both ASQ-3 and ASQ:SE-2, so a family enters demographic information once and completes either or both screeners as needed (agesandstages.com). Both are parent-completed in 10 to 15 minutes and score in 1 to 3 minutes, so administering both at one intake visit, on paper or sent ahead, does not double staff time. Using both gives a whole-child view at intake, general development from ASQ-3 and social-emotional health from ASQ:SE-2, which supports a more complete triage decision about whether a full evaluation is warranted. Results for both flow into ASQ Online with consistent scoring, storage, and reporting. This shared platform and combined family-facing workflow is what makes it practical to coordinate developmental and social-emotional screening in a single intake visit.